On Hierarchical Workflows
Decomposing business process models into state machines, it is quite common to encounter so-called hierarchical workflows, i.e. the creation in a workflow of an instance of another data element, which triggers a secundary workflow. We distinguish two possible scenarios.
Fire and forget: a workflow task triggers a secundary flow, which can be processed in an independent way.
A workflow task triggers a secundary flow, but the task in the primary flow can only be considered complete when processing is completed in the secondary flow.
In the second scenario, one should be cautious about possible dependencies and the corresponding coupling. More specifically, coupling may surface in two ways.
In case the primary workflow and/or task is polling the secondary flow that it has triggered, this could lead to lots of threads and coupling in time between software modules.
In case the secondary workflow has to report back to the primary flow upon completion, this could lead to a bidirectional dependency between the two workflows. This could result in a technical issue in case the two workflows belong to a different software component.
In order to avoid coupling and even possible locking in time, NS theory suggests that the secondary workflow needs to report back upon completion. However, to avoid bidirectional coupling between the code of both workflows, this should be done using a loosely coupled mechanism. An example of such a loosely coupled mechanism would be a service interface on the primary workflow. This would allow the primary flow to pass the URL of that service interface as a callback function to the secundary flow, avoiding tight coupling in the source base.
Based on the confirmation or completion message of the secondary workflow, the primary flow will set the corresponding status on the target data element of the primary flow. In this way, the secondary workflow does not need any knowledge of the possible states of the primary flow. In case multiple subflows need to be processed and completed before the primary flow is able to continue, it is again (a task in) the primary flow that needs to have the appropriate knowledge to combine the information provided by the various subflows.